The problem
A regulated entity must show that each provider was diligenced, monitored, audited and covered by exit terms, and that a provider's incident reached the regulator inside its clock. Every one of those duties requires something from the provider. Today that exchange runs on questionnaires, spreadsheets and annual audits, so neither side has continuous evidence and both are accountable as though they did.
You are the regulated entity. The activity moved; the accountability did not. You need to prove that every arrangement was diligenced at onboarding and at renewal, that your register matches what is actually running, that monitoring and audits happened inside their required frequency, and that a provider incident reached RBI inside six hours of detection.
Your provider's compliance state is computed continuously from signals, not collected annually by questionnaire. A lapsed review or a missing register entry surfaces as a failed control, not as an audit finding.
Your clients are regulated entities, and their obligations become your workload. Every bank client sends its own due diligence questionnaire, its own audit, its own SLA reporting format, on its own cycle. You answer the same questions repeatedly and you carry the incident-notification duty that starts their six-hour clock.
Your compliance state is proven once, continuously, from your own systems, and the same evidence serves every client that asks. Questionnaire responses stop being a project.
What it proves
For every incident, the detection timestamp, the time the provider notified you, the time you notified RBI, and the resulting margin against the six-hour limit. Where a clock is running, that it is visible before it expires rather than after.
That every live outsourcing arrangement appears in the inventory, that each entry has been evaluated inside its review period, and that sub-contractor dependencies are recorded rather than assumed.
That each arrangement has a due diligence record tied to its onboarding date, and that renewals triggered a fresh assessment rather than an automatic rollover.
That SLA adherence is being evaluated continuously against the terms actually contracted, and that each provider's audit fell inside its risk-based frequency rather than slipping quietly.
The same obligation can appear in several Directions, one per entity class, with different clause numbers. AssureNode binds your control to the clause in the instrument that applies to you.
What you get
Every arrangement, its review status, and the arrangements running in your systems that are not on the register.
Every reportable incident with its elapsed time, and every clock currently running.
Which arrangements have a current assessment, and which renewed without one.
Computed continuously against contracted terms, not reported monthly by the vendor.
A free scoping review. One obligation, one source system, two weeks.
We are selecting design partners for each solution. Early partners decide which obligations we prove first.